Epstein Index›Documents›EFTA00031694
💨IMPACT LEVEL 1 — MEH

Epstein File EFTA00031694: Subpoena (DS8)

Court FilingDate unavailableEFTA000316941 keyword hits
1
views
0
shares
0
reactions
1
persons
1
keywords
3
excerpts

This document discusses legal strategy regarding Rule 17 subpoena motions in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, referencing a judicial opinion from Judge AJN on a motion to quash a Rule 17 subpoena. It addresses proposed language regarding victim protections and concerns that expanding defendant subpoena capabilities could negatively impact victim and witness cooperation.

👤 Named in This Document
🔑 Evidence Keywords

📋 Key Excerpts3

PersonKeyword
Excerpt 1
We also recently got a strong opinion from AJN in Maxwell on a motion to quash a Rule 17 **subpoena**.
Excerpt 2
victim" language we had proposed adding to Rule 17(c), which, in our initial proposal read "After a complaint, indictment, or information is filed, a **subpoena**
Excerpt 3
Significantly expanding a defendant's Rule 17 **subpoena** capabilities may negatively influence the willingness of victims and witnesses to cooperate, and

Discussion

Let the world know how you feel.

What you just read should make you angry. Channel that into 17 syllables. Our AI helps you craft a haiku in seconds — then share it with the world.

Power hides in dark But sunlight finds every crack Truth cannot be bought

— Sarah K., after reading this document
✍️ Write Your Haiku

Haikus for Humanity — 5 · 7 · 5

React
Share𝕏🦋FBinFund Accountability