Epstein Index›Documents›EFTA00143736
⚡IMPACT LEVEL 3 — NOTEWORTHY

Epstein File EFTA00143736: Peter Mandelson, Brunel and Charles (DS9)

General DocumentDate unavailableEFTA001437363 keyword hits
1
views
0
shares
0
reactions
21
persons
26
keywords
15
excerpts

This document contains a statement explicitly rejecting attorney-client privilege claims, referencing attorney Alan Dershowitz and asserting inadequate legal services to a class action. The author discusses JP Morgan's involvement, mentions witness testimony regarding attorney conduct, and references Brad Edwards' case efforts to hold JP Morgan accountable.

📋 Key Excerpts15

PersonKeyword
Excerpt 1
As for client attorney **privilege** here, there is NONE!!
Excerpt 2
ACTUALLY LESS THEN NONE, LIKE MINUS INFINITY IF THAT EVEN EXISTS IS THE AMOUNT OF CLIENT ATTORNEY **PRIVILEGE** HERE ESPECIALLY AS SOMEONE LIKE DERSHOWITZ
Excerpt 3
HAVE NOT PROVIDED ADEQUATE OR EQUAL SERVICES TO THE CLASS ESPECIALLY AS IM AWARE THERE IS A CURRENT CLASS ACTION GOING ON THERE IS ZERO CLIENT ATTORNEY **PRIVILEGE**

Discussion

Let the world know how you feel.

What you just read should make you angry. Channel that into 17 syllables. Our AI helps you craft a haiku in seconds — then share it with the world.

Power hides in dark But sunlight finds every crack Truth cannot be bought

— Sarah K., after reading this document
✍️ Write Your Haiku

Haikus for Humanity — 5 · 7 · 5

React
Share𝕏🦋FBinFund Accountability