Epstein Index›Documents›EFTA00212713
💨IMPACT LEVEL 1 — MEH

Epstein File EFTA00212713: Non-Prosecution Agreement (DS9)

Court FilingDate unavailableEFTA002127131 keyword hits
1
views
0
shares
0
reactions
1
persons
1
keywords
2
excerpts

This document discusses legal arguments regarding whether Kenneth Starr or Lilly Ann Sanchez had a duty under 18 U.S.C. Section 3771(a) to consult with plaintiffs prior to entering into the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, in a case where no charges were filed in district court.

👤 Named in This Document
🔑 Evidence Keywords

📋 Key Excerpts2

PersonKeyword
Excerpt 1
Kenneth Starr or Lilly Ann Sanchez, has any bearing on whether a duty existed under 18 U.S.C. 3771(a) to consult with plaintiffs prior to entering into a **non**-**prosecution**
Excerpt 2
**agreement**, where no charges were filed in the district court.

Discussion

Let the world know how you feel.

What you just read should make you angry. Channel that into 17 syllables. Our AI helps you craft a haiku in seconds — then share it with the world.

Power hides in dark But sunlight finds every crack Truth cannot be bought

— Sarah K., after reading this document
✍️ Write Your Haiku

Haikus for Humanity — 5 · 7 · 5

React
Share𝕏🦋FBinFund Accountability