Epstein File EFTA01196980: Large_file_1mb_plus, Privilege and Professional (DS9)

Epstein Index›Documents›EFTA01196980

💨IMPACT LEVEL 1 — MEH

Epstein File EFTA01196980: Large_file_1mb_plus, Privilege and Professional (DS9)

Court FilingDate unavailableEFTA011969802 keyword hits

1

views

0

shares

0

reactions

0

persons

10

keywords

15

excerpts

This court document addresses Epstein's argument that correspondence should be protected from future use by adversaries (DE 295). The court rejected this position, finding no legal support for Epstein's protective order request. The ruling concerns document disclosure and protective order standards.

👤 Named in This Document

No named persons linked yet

🔑 Evidence Keywords

large_file_1mb_plus privilege professional submission sealed non-prosecution agreement documentary proffer Crime Victims Rights Act client

📋 Key Excerpts15

PersonKeyword

Excerpt 1

And, although Epstein argues that the correspondence should be "protected from future use by an adversary" (DE 295), this Court has already held that Petitioners The Court finds no support (and Epstei

Excerpt 2

The court held that "[n]o **privilege** prevents the disclosure of the plea negotiations." Id. at 1008.

Excerpt 3

The court also rejected arguments that the correspondence was protected under the work-product **privilege** or a common-law **privilege** for plea negotiations